Are there factors which caused the printing revolution to begin in Europe in 1450 and not some other place some other time?

Are there factors which caused the printing revolution to begin in Europe in 1450 and not some other place some other time?


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The printing press was a big deal. It brought a communication revolution and led to the development of larger collective consciousnesses.

What I am refering to the printing revolution is the widespread dissemination of written content by publishing, widespread creation of content to be printed and widespread consumption of printed material.

Gutenberg was a spark which lit the fire of the printing revolution. But how widespread or rare was the… fuel and the oxygen?

Two parts

  • Could it have been occurred as readily in any year before 1450?
  • Could it have been occurred as readily in any sedentary civilization other than Europe?

I understand that it is broad, and borders opinion based, but, indulge me?


A modern misconception was that Gutenberg invented printing; this was not the case. Woodblock printing was a craft over a thousand years old when he came about.

Another misconception was that Gutenberg invented moveable type; this was not the case either. Moveable type was invented four hundred years before Gutenberg's time in China, and made its way to Europe eventually.

What Gutenberg did invent were various tools and procedures to print more, faster, and cheaper (most importantly the hand mould and the printing press, which significantly sped up the process). This allowed European printing to catch up with Chinese/Korean book production, and eventually overtake it.

So it is more appropriate to look at Gutenberg's work as a big evolutionary step, not actually a revolution. He didn't invent all of it in a blaze of divine inspiration; he (significantly) optimized existing processes.


There were corroborating factors that helped the "taking off" part in Europe.

One of them was already brought up by @Semaphore -- alphabets (prevalent in Europe) are easier to set in print than syllabaries or logograms, as there are fewer glyphs to chose from. This is a gradual quality, though; it is certainly possible to use moveable type with e.g. the Chinese writing system (see above).

Another factor favoring Europe was the high demand by wealthy patrons for one specific, large book -- the bible -- offering high potential profits that could be re-invested.

So… yes, it could have happened earlier, or in a different place of the world. It did happen in other places, to be exact -- it just did not "take off" the way it did in Europe.


Watch the video: Η Μεσσήνη κατά την περίοδο της Επανάστασης


Comments:

  1. Utkarsh

    I will not allow will not agree with you

  2. Mace

    I think, that you are mistaken. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

  3. Vinsone

    Bravo, brilliant phrase and timely

  4. Eder

    Rather amusing opinion

  5. Aekerley

    I congratulate, remarkable idea and it is duly

  6. Adal

    I am final, I am sorry, but I suggest to go another by.



Write a message